Wow, we finally hit $100,000 worth of bitcoin. What a time to be alive! A cypherpunk experiment has begun as Internet magic money is now the seventh largest asset globally, surpassing a market capitalization of $2 trillion. But make no mistake: we’re just getting started. 2025 will be the year of Bitcoin. $100,000 seems like just the beginning.
This is my third Bitcoin bull market after entering 2016. From experience, the party is still early. Here’s why I think $100,000 Bitcoin is just the tip of the iceberg:
- Trump has not yet taken office. The next two years, especially its first year, will likely bring very favorable regulations to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.
- The US has not yet started accumulating BTC stockpiles. When it does, it will warn all countries to adopt bitcoin as soon as possible.
- Historically, the year after the halving it increases more as supply shrinks. We are now at the post-2024 halving. Do the math.
- More and more public companies are adopting bitcoin Treasuries. This trend will accelerate exponentially in 2025.
- Some US states have introduced legislation to hold bitcoin in reserves. More are expected to follow.
- Putin is now actively talking about Bitcoin, passing pro-crypto laws in Russia and allowing domestic mining of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Global adoption is gearing up.
With a pro-Bitcoin US president aiming to make America the global Bitcoin capital, you better believe we’re going over the moon. Game theory says that other nations must compete and purchase BTC or risk irrelevance.
So no, $100,000 is not the ceiling. I would be shocked if we don’t surpass historical multiples this cycle, especially as nationwide adoption takes over. The show has just begun.
Happy $100,000, but remember this is just the beginning, my friends. 2025 will be the turning point year for Bitcoin as it consolidates itself as a global reserve asset. I’m incredibly optimistic – keep holding on tight for the wild ride ahead!
This article is a Take. The opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.