Americans’ AI concerns span copyright, tariffs, energy, China

More than 10,000 Americans made their notes on the Donald Trump Ai action plan, with the highest concerns about the violation of copyright, using artificial intelligence (AI) for nefarious purposes, the threat of the East, and how the customs duties will harm the development of the sector.

In February, the White House called for general inputs in the artificial intelligence plan, which with Trump replaced by his predecessor Joe Biden, more than a year ago. The White House Science and Technology Office (OSTP) has now published the presentations, which included inputs from academic circles, startups, innovators and market leaders such as Openai and Meta (Nasdaq: Meta).

“America, and the global pioneer in artificial intelligence technology must remain. The large size of the general comments we have received reflects the deep interest that Americans enjoy in the future of artificial intelligence,” commented the director of OSTP Michael Kratsus.

While the scope of fears and recommendations is very different, some aspects occupied the center of the lead in all fields. One of them is a violation of copyright and intellectual property, which is the field of inciting the public against artificial intelligence companies. The former believes that these companies must have to compensate for data and creativity owners (and dozens of lawsuits are already in court), while the latter believes that the organizers must protect them more and give them more space in accessing data.

This section was evident in reactions. The public public, human rights activists and most non -profit organizations urged the Trump government to implement the most striking laws to protect the rights of copyright and punish artificial intelligence companies strongly that bring these laws. They called for increasing designs protection and better compensation when using their data to train artificial intelligence models.

Artificial intelligence companies had a contradictory view. Openai from the government wants to “maintain the ability of the American AI models to learn from copyrights.” Even the ChatGPT maker has targeted European data protection laws, which they say are unpredictable and “obstructing the innovation of artificial intelligence, especially for smaller and newer expatriates who have limited budgets.” America should not follow its example.

This opinion was widely kept by Meta, Google (Nasdaq: Googl), Noteropic, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), French Mistral Ai, Amazon (Nasdaq: Amzn), and other large companies of artificial intelligence. Investors in these companies also warned against limiting the arrival of artificial intelligence models to data.

Andresson Horwitz said: “

While the general public and the technical elite were divided into copyright, energy consumption, artificial intelligence security, and the abolition of industry, they united on one side: China.

The audience worries that China can pose a challenge to America’s domination of artificial intelligence, with Dibsic often cited as a display of the power of the Asian nation. Deepseek models shook the Western world and interrogated the leadership of Aire Ament. Two weeks after its launch, Deepseek was the most downloaded application in the United States, which led to a loss of market value of $ 593 billion in NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA), which is the highest loss for one day in history.

Openai indicated that the “authoritarian” leadership allows it to resources quickly, and the United States must respond somewhat or delay. Google raised the growing patent in China, which recorded the highest rise in the world last year.

Anthropor suggested that the United States government must achieve artificial intelligence models that were released on the open internet and evaluate whether it is “worth the interest of national security.” He pointed out that Dibsic in China does not have the same security candidates that American models do; For example, he answers biological weapons questions, “even when formulated with a clear intention.”

While many concerns were valid, reactions from major companies also called on China to push its own interests. For example, Andressen Horowitz urged the US government to protect artificial intelligence companies against content creators and old media companies, which “offer misleading arguments [AI data scraping] It violates their copyright. “If Trump fails on the sides of the leaders of artificial intelligence, then American companies will be in a non -fired position on their competitors in China, she says.

The United States government has greatly installed it to the sale of US chips such as NVIDIA and AMD to China. The Biden era adheres to the export of advanced chips to China, such as NVIDIA HE100, which is an industry treatment in America AI.

But this is not enough, as Antarbur says. The company believes that even low performance chips, such as H20, excels in some aspects such as generating text, which it believes allow China to compete with the United States.

“The Trump administration has an opportunity to close this vulnerability,” said Antarbur.

In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work properly within the law and prosperity in the face of increased challenges, it needs to merge the institution’s Blockchain system that guarantees the quality of the data inputs and its kingdom – allowing it to maintain safe data while ensuring data installation. Check Coingek coverage On this emerging technique to learn more Why will Blockchain Enterprise will be the backbone of Amnesty International.

Watch: Blockchain integration capabilities with artificial intelligence

https://www.youtube.com/watch? Title = “YouTube Video Player” Fraeborder = “0” AWDER = “Accepterometer; Automatic play; The portfolio and Rick. Cracks; gyroscope; Image in the image Web-Share “Quintrepolicy =” Strict-Origen-Cross-Origen ”LeFresFULSCREEN =” “>