Texas’ battle with Bulgaria is more than just a headline. It is a flashpoint in the evolving world of stablecoin cryptocurrency diplomacy. When Tether froze $44.7 million in SDT at the request of Bulgarian police, alleging illicit activity, Riverstone Consultancy (a Texas-based firm) responded with a US lawsuit alleging a procedural violation and lost opportunities.
This case puts stablecoin issuers, law enforcement, and cross-border jurisdictions in direct conflict, and could reshape how global stablecoin freezes are handled in the future.
What sparked the $44.7 million stablecoin cryptocurrency battle between Texas and Bulgaria?
The dispute began in April 2025, when Tether froze $44.7 million from eight wallets controlled by Riverstone, at the request of Bulgarian police. Riverstone claims the freeze was inappropriate and lacked sufficient legal basis under bilateral treaties, alleging that Tether failed to validate the order through Bulgarian judicial authorities.
BREAKING: Riverstone Consultancy has filed a lawsuit against Tether, alleging that $44.72 million in USDT was frozen after an informal request from Bulgarian law enforcement.
The complaint accuses Tether of:
1⣠Violating international legal protocols by freezing assets on a local basis… pic.twitter.com/RqWpdBF6kf– Jacob King (@JacobKinge) October 15, 2025
Meanwhile, Tether points to its terms of service, which allows assets to be frozen in response to official requests. Over the years, Tether has frozen billions associated with fraud and penalties. Riverstone’s lawsuit, now filed in US courts, alleges breach of fiduciary duty, diversion and unjust enrichment due to Tether continuing to earn interest on the backing assets.
The standoff highlights the growing tension when stablecoins span multiple jurisdictions, which govern freezes, and whether issuers will be held liable if they âover-complyâ without following due process.
Discover: 16+ new and upcoming Binance listings in 2025
Have stablecoins frozen become tools of economic soft power?
This case suggests that stablecoins can become geopolitical tools. Since stablecoins like USDT act as global capital railways, freezing them could amount to extraterritorial sanctions or diplomatic pressure. The clash between Texas and Bulgaria suggests that governments may use control of stablecoins as a form of soft power.
Stablecoins are not an investment – they are a tool.
Backed by US Treasuries, it is boosting global money flows, and is about to experience the Cambrian explosion under the Law of Genius.
I broke everything on TV
pic.twitter.com/HbJRtVA9Ro
– The Wolf of All the Streets (@scottmelker) August 31, 2025
Countries are vying to oversee stablecoins, with the EU’s MiCA rules aiming to limit the dominance of the US dollar, and China’s e-yuan asserting its domestic control over digital finance. Meanwhile, US initiatives such as the proposed GENIUS Stablecoin Act seek to strengthen US regulatory superiority. In this context, this lawsuit is not just about $44 million; It is a test of whether private stablecoin companies will become an arm of state policy or guarantors of user rights.
DISCOVER: 15+ Upcoming Coinbase Listings to Watch in 2025
Could this case redefine cryptocurrency diplomacy and enforcement?
If Riverstone wins (or even imposes a stricter precedent), stablecoin issuers may adopt more defensive legal stances. They may reject or delay freezing requests that lack adequate vetting, whitelisting only those backed by verified treaties or courts. This would shift the implementation process from âimmediate freezingâ to judicial controls. Conversely, governments may push for treaties mandating real-time compliance by stablecoin companies, and codifying their role in global law enforcement. This threatens to turn issuers into quasi-judges in cross-border disputes, a role they were never designed to play.
I don’t think people have woken up to the fact that all stablecoins can be frozen by a central entity
â Mert | helios.dev (@0xMert_) October 15, 2025
If the courts side with Riverstone, it could lead to a freeze on futures contracts, enabling users to sue over access to assets, and forcing stablecoin issuers to build better transparency around the freeze protocols. This cryptocurrency battle between Texas and Bulgaria may represent a shift in how stablecoins, law, and sovereignty intersect â potentially turning a âcrypto freezeâ into a regular diplomatic tool.
Discover: 10+ Next Cryptocurrencies to 100X in 2025
Join the 99Bitcoins News Discord here to get the latest market updates
Key takeaways
Texas files Tether lawsuit against Bulgarian police department and asks to freeze $44.7 million
Will stablecoin diplomacy change?
Texas Firm Fights Bulgarian Police Over $44M USD Freeze: Is Stablecoin Geopolitics the Next Frontier for Diplomacy? appeared first on 99Bitcoins.